Encore
Ask the evidenceThe ArchiveAbout Encore
Sign in
Encore by Whitelabel, with Culture NextCities in the network: sign in for your workspace

The ECoC evidence base

The Archive

Forty years of European Capitals of Culture in their own words: what cities promised, what they did, and what the evaluations found.

documents
472

documents

cities
190

cities

evaluations
53

evaluations

bid books
182

bid books

1985–2031

title years covered

All shelvesEvaluations 53Monitoring and progress reports 1Bid books 182Selection and monitoring reports 111EU framework and official documents 27Strategies and action plans 5Research, guides and frameworks 33Shared by cities 1Sent in by members 59Published by cities 12
TypeBid book (pre-selection) 3Bid book (final selection) 6Selection panel report 14Monitoring panel report 1Ex-post evaluation 14Guide or toolkit 1Research 7Other

47 documents for “European dimension”

Clear
Ask Encore: “European dimension”An answer from across the Archive, every claim cited to its document.

Found inside the documents

  • capitals-culture-2007-08-evaluation en
1
What the document types mean
Bid book (pre-selection)
A city's first application for the title, judged by the selection panel to make the shortlist.
Evidence of intent: what a city promised, not what it delivered.
Bid book (final selection)
A shortlisted city's full, final application for the title, with its programme, budget and plans.
Evidence of intent: what a city promised, not what it delivered.
Selection panel report
The EU expert panel's assessment of the bids in one competition, with its reasons and its recommendation.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Monitoring panel report
The EU expert panel's report on a designated city's preparations before its title year, with its advice.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Ex-post evaluation
An assessment, written after the title year or a programme, of what it actually achieved, usually by independent evaluators.
Evidence of outcome: what actually happened.
Monitoring or progress report
A city's own report on how its programme is going, written while it runs, with the figures it has tracked.
Evidence of outcome: what actually happened.
Strategy
A city's long-term plan or policy for culture, including legacy strategies and council decisions.
A plan: how a city meant to deliver and keep going.
Action plan
A concrete plan of what a city or organisation will do, by when and with what resources.
A plan: how a city meant to deliver and keep going.
Guide or toolkit
Practical how-to material that others can reuse: guides, toolkits, handbooks and templates.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Research
Studies, frameworks and papers across one or more cities, written by researchers rather than by a city.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Other
Anything else: news, memos, programme brochures and documents that fit no type above.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.

…be broadly grouped under the three specific objectives set out in intervention logic, i.e. “developing cultural activities", "promoting the European dimension of and through culture" and “social and economic development through culture”.

  • Selection panel report — Latvia ECoC 2027 (pre-selection)
    2027

    European dimension The panel recommends that all four cities revisit this criterion with great care. Although with a promising approach to this criterion, the proposals failed to engage fully with the challenges.

  • Report from the Commission — first interim evaluation of the ECoC action 2020–2033, COM(2025) 587
    2025

    Focus groups highlighted the growing interest in assessing the impact of culture, with many European city networks creating dedicated workstreams on cultural impact assessment.

  • Selection panel report — EFTA/EEA + candidate countries ECoC 2028 (pre-selection)
    2028

    European dimension The European dimension being the raison d’être of an ECoC the panel expects to find Europe at the heart of both final bids and permeated throughout the cultural and artistic programmes.

  • Selection panel report — Germany ECoC 2025 (pre-selection)
    2025

    European dimension The panel felt that this criterion was promising, but considerably under-developed. At this stage, the proposals are too much looking at the surface of the challenges.

  • Guide for cities preparing to bid — European Capitals of Culture 2020–2033
    2014

    The overall vision of the whole programme must be European, and the European dimension must therefore be reflected in the cultural and artistic content as well as in the objectives set for the ECOC project and the corresponding indicators.

  • Selection panel report — Hungary ECoC 2023 (final selection)
    2023

    The monitoring and evaluation procedure is described in quite a reasonable way but not sufficiently in detail European Capital of Culture 2023 in Hungary The Expert Panel's report – Selection stage 9 to allow a concrete assessment related…

  • EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Aarhus, Pafos
    Aarhus & Pafos · 2017

    As required by Decision 1622/2006/EC, the “European dimension” was one of two main criteria used to select the ECoC in 2017. It is therefore important to consider how the European dimension featured in the eventual programme of Aarhus…

  • Selection panel report — Sweden ECoC 2029 (pre-selection)
    2029

    European dimension The European dimension being the raison d’être of an ECoC the panel expects to find Europe at the heart of the final bids and permeated throughout the cultural and artistic programmes.

  • Selection panel report — Belgium ECoC 2030 (pre-selection)
    2030

    European dimension The panel recommends that all three cities revisit this criterion with great care. Although with a promising approach to this criterion, the proposals failed to engage fully with the challenges.

  • Linz 2009 — Evaluation Report
    Linz · 2009

    Local or national themes Mechanism for undertaking cultural activities Events featuring European Collaboration, co-productions, exchanges between operators in different countries Events featuring local or national artists Events featuring…

  • Ptuj 2025 — Final selection
    Ptuj · 2025

    An important part of the planned ECoC Ptuj 2025 programme includes a European dimension in one form or another, most often involving partners from abroad, foreign experts from various fields being involved in our programmes, the emphasis on…

  • Selection panel report — Spain ECoC 2031 (pre-selection)
    2031

    …to clarify unique elements that specifically tie the concept to the city, rather than presenting a generic concept applicable to any European city. Consistency between the selected vision and all other elements of the bid must be ensured.

  • Molenbeek 2030 — Pre-selection
    Molenbeek · 2030

    …weakened European achievements for the fu- ture, like the Green Deal, that are foundational for our solidarity with the future generations of our con- tinent.

  • EC Ex-Post Evaluation — 2016 (San Sebastián & Wrocław)
    San Sebastián & Wrocław · 2016

    …through large scale mass participation projects- but rather through more intimate setting, with small [audiences] in personal settings’. 2.3.2 European dimension One of the overarching objectives of the ECoC Action is around ‘enhancing the…

  • Selection panel report — Ireland ECoC 2020 (pre-selection)
    2020

    Selection of the European Capital of Culture in 2020 in Ireland Pre-selection Stage 17 A city’s cultural strategy will normally be wider in scope than the objectives of an ECOC.

  • San Sebastián 2016 — Evaluation Report
    San Sebastián · 2016

    …through large scale mass participation projects- but rather through more intimate setting, with small [audiences] in personal settings’. 2.3.2 European dimension One of the overarching objectives of the ECoC Action is around ‘enhancing the…

  • Leeuwarden 2018 — European Commission evaluation
    Leeuwarden · 2018

    Another strong aspect of Leeuwarden-Friesland’s ECoC approach to the European dimension was the existence of funding to specifically help projects find and secure partners and activities from across Europe.

  • Selection panel report — Portugal ECoC 2027 (pre-selection)
    2027

    It cannot be limited to relations with other, former and future ECoCs, existing European cultural networks or twin cities, which has been understood in most of the final selection bids. The European dimension has a two-way direction.

  • Umea and Lund Selection Comparison (Umeå 2014)
    2014

    The emphasis on collaborations has been a way to balance out the doubt of Umeå’s lack of European Dimension due to their periphery position. This indicated that Umeå’s bid, and the informants all speak of Umeå as having a blended identity…

  • Selection panel report — France ECoC 2028 (pre-selection)
    2028

    It is not as coherent and strong a part of the programme as the rest is. ● The programme presents 30 interesting projects with a strong European dimension, which make a firm commitment to low carbon impact and follows the 2030 climate…

  • Herceg Novi 2021 — Pre-selection
    Herceg Novi · 2021

    …Promoting the cultural diversity of Europe, intercultural dialogue and greater mutual understanding between European citizens The idea of exploring the European Dimension is fascinating for us.

  • Selection panel report — Austria ECoC 2024 (final selection)
    2024

    While several programme elements have a development potential, the wider coherence of the projects proposed with a specific and targeted European narrative is not made fully visible.

  • European Capitals of Culture: success strategies and long-term effects (Garcia and Cox, European Parliament, 2013)
    2013

    Perhaps as a consequence, the European dimension of the ECOC Action was interpreted in very different ways by the 2007 and 2008 ECOC (ECORYS, 2009a: vi).

  • Ravenna 2019 — Pre-selection
    Ravenna · 2019

    As regards “The European Dimension”, how does the city intend to contribute to the following objectives: a) to strengthen cooperation between the cultural operators, artists and cities of your country and other Member States, in all…

  • EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Guimarães, Maribor
    Guimarães & Maribor · 2012

    3.5.2 European dimension To date, the online survey has generated a very low response rate. However, a large majority of organisations which responded identified that they included organisations or artworks from other countries in their…

  • Proposal: renewing European Capitals of Culture 2034–2047 (COM(2026) 455)
    Cluj-Napoca. Contributed by Cluj-Napoca and published to everyone.

    European dimension: It is a key aspect of the ECoC action (and one of the criteria for selecting title holders), but it is not often fully understood by many stakeholders.

  • Impact assessment accompanying COM(2012) 407, SWD(2012) 226
    2012

    Problem n° 2: the limited European dimension The ECoC are not the only culture-led regeneration strategy that can be used by a city. The opening of a new museum for example such as the Guggenheim in Bilbao or the Centre Pompidou in Metz…

  • Selection panel report — ECoC 2021 (Greece & Romania) (pre-selection)
    2021

    European Dimension The panel felt that this criterion was considerably under-developed in both bidbooks. At this stage the proposals are too inward looking in their local context in the city, the region and country.

  • Three Sisters 2020 — Final selection
    Three Sisters · 2020

    …and quality of the activities: Promoting the cultural diversity of Europe, intercultural dialogue and greater mutual understanding between European citizens; Highlighting the common aspects of European cultures, heritage and history, as…

  • Valletta 2018 — Final Report
    Valletta · 2018

    European Dimension In November 2012, the selection panel observed that the Valletta 2018 bid needed improvement in highlighting the European dimension of the programme and that this should not be solely interpreted as a showcasing of Malta…

  • Lublin 2029
    Lublin · 2029
  • EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Umeå, Riga
    Umeå & Riga · 2014

    The European dimension of Umeå2014 was based on the overarching concept of the “The Northern Room”. This concept was intended to convey different ideas, such as Umeå as a room in the European “house” and Umeå as a place for border-crossing…

  • Selection panel report — EFTA/EEA & candidate countries ECoC 2024 (final selection)
    2024

    European dimension The bid-book highlights the role of Mostar with its complex history as reflecting the dilemmas of today’s Europe. The main topics the ECOC wants to tackle are for example migration, war refugees, integration of refugees…

  • EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Tallinn, Turku
    Tallinn & Turku · 2011

    Promoting the European dimension was relevant for Turku 2011 and featured in the project selection criteria. It was reflected in the objective relating to internationality within the original application.

  • Timișoara 2021
    Timișoara · 2021

    Enabling participation of European citizens who cannot come or stay in Timișoara, including diaspora European dimension Programme examples Invisible/Visible Fluid Views Chiaroscuro Energy Incubators Bright City Spotlight Heritage Moving…

  • Tartu 2024
    Tartu · 2024

    …through this interaction and co-creation can we develop Arts of Survival for the whole of Europe – to spread more eco-friendly lifestyles in European cities, to bring gener- ations and diverse walks of life together for exchanging skills…

  • Promoting Europe through ‘Unity in Diversity’: Avignon as European Capital of Culture in 2000
    Avignon · 2000

    These studies empha- size interaction and exchange as crucial to the European dimension of these ECOC initiatives. Speaking of the ECOC bid by Santiago de Compostela, Sharon Roseman (2004:84) argues that “in contrast to the earlier image…

  • Kalamata 2021 — Final selection
    Kalamata · 2021

    …but will be published in 2019 – impacts evaluation, in 2021 – mid-term progress, in 2022 – ECoC impact and in 2025 – Legacy evaluation. 16 European Dimension 17 9. ― Elaborate on the scope and quality of the activities. a.

  • Decision No 445/2014/EU establishing a Union action for the European Capitals of Culture 2020–2033 (consolidated, 5 Oct 2017)
    2014

    Every application shall be based on a cultural programme with a strong European dimension. The cultural programme shall cover the year of the title and shall be created specifically for the title, in accordance with the criteria laid down…

  • Also matching the title, city or themes

    Nova 2025 — Monitoring Report

    Nova Gorica & Gorizia (GO! 2025) · 2025

    EC Ex-Post Evaluation — 2015 (Mons & Plzeň)

    Mons & Plzeň · 2015

    Marseille 2013

    Marseille-Provence · 2013

    EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Essen Ruhr, Pécs, Istanbul

    Essen/Ruhr, Pécs, Istanbul · 2010

    Luxembourg City 2007 — Evaluation Report

    Luxembourg & Greater Region · 2007

    Palmer/Rae Associates — European Cities and Capitals of Culture 1995–2004, Part II (city reports)

    Cross-city (Palmer Report Pt II) · 2004

    Cáceres 2031 strengthens its alliances with Eastern Europe through Romania and consolidates its European dimension - Cáceres 2031

    Context

    Cáceres 2031 strengthens its alliances with Eastern Europe through Romania and consolidates its European dimension - Cáceres 2031