The ECoC evidence base

The Archive

Forty years of European Capitals of Culture in their own words: what cities promised, what they did, and what the evaluations found.

documents: 472
cities: 190
evaluations: 53
bid books: 182; 1985–2031

7 documents of type ex-post evaluation for “Health”

Clear

Ask Encore: “Health”An answer from across the Archive, every claim cited to its document.

Found inside the documents

What the document types mean

Bid book (pre-selection): A city's first application for the title, judged by the selection panel to make the shortlist.; Evidence of intent: what a city promised, not what it delivered.
Bid book (final selection): A shortlisted city's full, final application for the title, with its programme, budget and plans.; Evidence of intent: what a city promised, not what it delivered.
Selection panel report: The EU expert panel's assessment of the bids in one competition, with its reasons and its recommendation.; Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Monitoring panel report: The EU expert panel's report on a designated city's preparations before its title year, with its advice.; Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Ex-post evaluation: An assessment, written after the title year or a programme, of what it actually achieved, usually by independent evaluators.; Evidence of outcome: what actually happened.
Monitoring or progress report: A city's own report on how its programme is going, written while it runs, with the figures it has tracked.; Evidence of outcome: what actually happened.
Strategy: A city's long-term plan or policy for culture, including legacy strategies and council decisions.; A plan: how a city meant to deliver and keep going.
Action plan: A concrete plan of what a city or organisation will do, by when and with what resources.; A plan: how a city meant to deliver and keep going.
Guide or toolkit: Practical how-to material that others can reuse: guides, toolkits, handbooks and templates.; Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Research: Studies, frameworks and papers across one or more cities, written by researchers rather than by a city.; Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Other: Anything else: news, memos, programme brochures and documents that fit no type above.; Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.

Galway 2020 — Evaluation Report

Galway · 2020

Health (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 2021 (Act No. 24 of 2021) continuation of public health act amendment into 2021. 21 Jan – Apr 2021 May 2021 Disapplication of certain restrictions over the Christmas Period (18 December 2020 to 6 January…

Maribor 2012 — Final Report

Maribor · 2012

Health problems, old age, not suitable for pensioners. Lack of money. Lack of information, poor promotion, no invitation. No opportunity, no reason to go. 7.1 6.6 6.6 14.4 18.3 3.1 Other obligations. 2.9 Work obligations.

Liverpool 2008 — Impact Assessment

Liverpool · 2008

Membership included senior officers from the local health trusts, police force, neighbourhood management, housing, as well as faith and voluntary networks and the media.

Valletta 2018 — Final Report

Valletta · 2018

…Correlation analysis In 2016, we found that respondents with higher levels of education tended to report higher level of perceived overall health, visited more EU countries, earned higher income levels, met socially more frequently with…

Liverpool 2008 — Baseline Report

Liverpool · 2008

…Employment levels;  Material Well-being | Benefit dependency, income, Housing type/ownership, Access to credit  Physical Well-being | Health  Safety | Safer communities, Feeling safer  Social Cohesion | Relationships with friends and…

Liverpool 2008 — Baseline Report

Liverpool · 2008

Also matching the title, city or themes

Turku 2011 — Final Report

Turku · 2011