Encore
Ask the evidenceThe ArchiveAbout Encore
Sign in
Encore by Whitelabel, with Culture NextCities in the network: sign in for your workspace

The ECoC evidence base

The Archive

Forty years of European Capitals of Culture in their own words: what cities promised, what they did, and what the evaluations found.

documents
472

documents

cities
190

cities

evaluations
53

evaluations

bid books
182

bid books

1985–2031

title years covered

All shelvesEvaluations 53Monitoring and progress reports 1Bid books 182Selection and monitoring reports 111EU framework and official documents 27Strategies and action plans 5Research, guides and frameworks 33Shared by cities 1Sent in by members 59Published by cities 12
TypeBid book (pre-selection) 3Bid book (final selection) 6Selection panel report 14Monitoring panel report 1Ex-post evaluation 14Guide or toolkit 1Research 7Other

8 documents of type guide or toolkit or research for “European dimension”

Clear
Ask Encore: “European dimension”An answer from across the Archive, every claim cited to its document.

Found inside the documents

1
Any type
What the document types mean
Bid book (pre-selection)
A city's first application for the title, judged by the selection panel to make the shortlist.
Evidence of intent: what a city promised, not what it delivered.
Bid book (final selection)
A shortlisted city's full, final application for the title, with its programme, budget and plans.
Evidence of intent: what a city promised, not what it delivered.
Selection panel report
The EU expert panel's assessment of the bids in one competition, with its reasons and its recommendation.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Monitoring panel report
The EU expert panel's report on a designated city's preparations before its title year, with its advice.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Ex-post evaluation
An assessment, written after the title year or a programme, of what it actually achieved, usually by independent evaluators.
Evidence of outcome: what actually happened.
Monitoring or progress report
A city's own report on how its programme is going, written while it runs, with the figures it has tracked.
Evidence of outcome: what actually happened.
Strategy
A city's long-term plan or policy for culture, including legacy strategies and council decisions.
A plan: how a city meant to deliver and keep going.
Action plan
A concrete plan of what a city or organisation will do, by when and with what resources.
A plan: how a city meant to deliver and keep going.
Guide or toolkit
Practical how-to material that others can reuse: guides, toolkits, handbooks and templates.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Research
Studies, frameworks and papers across one or more cities, written by researchers rather than by a city.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Other
Anything else: news, memos, programme brochures and documents that fit no type above.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Report from the Commission — first interim evaluation of the ECoC action 2020–2033, COM(2025) 587
2025

Focus groups highlighted the growing interest in assessing the impact of culture, with many European city networks creating dedicated workstreams on cultural impact assessment.

  • Guide for cities preparing to bid — European Capitals of Culture 2020–2033
    2014

    The overall vision of the whole programme must be European, and the European dimension must therefore be reflected in the cultural and artistic content as well as in the objectives set for the ECOC project and the corresponding indicators.

  • European Capitals of Culture: success strategies and long-term effects (Garcia and Cox, European Parliament, 2013)
    2013

    Perhaps as a consequence, the European dimension of the ECOC Action was interpreted in very different ways by the 2007 and 2008 ECOC (ECORYS, 2009a: vi).

  • Proposal: renewing European Capitals of Culture 2034–2047 (COM(2026) 455)
    Cluj-Napoca. Contributed by Cluj-Napoca and published to everyone.

    European dimension: It is a key aspect of the ECoC action (and one of the criteria for selecting title holders), but it is not often fully understood by many stakeholders.

  • Impact assessment accompanying COM(2012) 407, SWD(2012) 226
    2012

    Problem n° 2: the limited European dimension The ECoC are not the only culture-led regeneration strategy that can be used by a city. The opening of a new museum for example such as the Guggenheim in Bilbao or the Centre Pompidou in Metz…

  • Promoting Europe through ‘Unity in Diversity’: Avignon as European Capital of Culture in 2000
    Avignon · 2000

    These studies empha- size interaction and exchange as crucial to the European dimension of these ECOC initiatives. Speaking of the ECOC bid by Santiago de Compostela, Sharon Roseman (2004:84) argues that “in contrast to the earlier image…

  • Decision No 445/2014/EU establishing a Union action for the European Capitals of Culture 2020–2033 (consolidated, 5 Oct 2017)
    2014

    Every application shall be based on a cultural programme with a strong European dimension. The cultural programme shall cover the year of the title and shall be created specifically for the title, in accordance with the criteria laid down…

  • Also matching the title, city or themes

    Palmer/Rae Associates — European Cities and Capitals of Culture 1995–2004, Part II (city reports)

    Cross-city (Palmer Report Pt II) · 2004